Skip to main content

LOCAL AUTHORITIES CENTRAL RAILWAY CONSORTIUM

EDM (Early Day Motion) 223: tabled on 15 October 2001

Tabled in the 2001-02 session.

This motion has been signed by 32 Members. It has not yet had any amendments submitted.

As this motion is using historical data, we may not have the record of the original ordering, in which case signatories are listed alphabetically.

Motion text

That this House welcomes the establishment of the Local Authorities Central Railway Consortium by 17 councils with a combined population of nearly four million people to address common concerns about the Central Railway project; notes that the Central Railway scheme involves the construction of a 672 km long freight railway between the North West of England and northern France via the Channel Tunnel, offering a lorries on trains service; regrets that the promoters have failed to undertake any substantive assessment of the environmental impact of this massive project, to provide evidence that it would integrate effectively with the existing rail freight network and not disrupt passenger services on the Chiltern Line, or to show that lorry journeys to the proposed huge freight terminals would not substantially increase heavy goods vehicle mileage on congested roads and motorways; observes that Arup Transportation, on behalf of the consortium, has raised serious concerns about the construction costs and financial viability of the project and its advisability as a strategic transport solution; views with alarm the intention of the promoters of the project to persuade the Government to fast-track its progress by introducing a hybrid bill rather than allowing normal consideration under the Transport and Works Act 1992; and whilst supporting a shift of freight from road to rail, invites the Minister to decline to be pressed by Central Railways into premature acceptance of the project unless and until the legitimate concerns of the Local Authorities Central Railway Consortium have been properly addressed.

The first 6 Members who have signed to support the motion are the sponsors. The primary sponsor is generally the person who tabled the motion and has responsibility for it. The date shown is when the Member signed the motion.

In addition to the sponsors, the following Members have signed to support the motion.

Boswell, Mr Tim
Conservative
Signed on 24 October 2001
Daventry
Clarke, Mr Tony
Labour
Signed on 17 October 2001
Northampton South
Davies, Geraint
Labour
Signed on 10 December 2001
Croydon Central
Dorrell, Mr Stephen
Conservative
Signed on 14 March 2002
Charnwood
Drew, Mr David
Labour
Signed on 1 November 2001
Stroud
Gillan, Mrs Cheryl
Conservative
Signed on 15 October 2001
Chesham and Amersham
Goodman, Mr Paul
Conservative
Signed on 15 October 2001
Wycombe
Grayling, Chris
Conservative
Signed on 17 October 2001
Epsom and Ewell
Hammond, Mr Philip
Conservative
Signed on 18 October 2001
Runnymede and Weybridge
Jones, Lynne
Labour
Signed on 16 October 2001
Birmingham, Selly Oak
Jones, Mr Nigel
Liberal Democrat
Signed on 23 October 2001
Cheltenham
King, Andy
Labour
Signed on 15 October 2001
Rugby and Kenilworth
Lidington, Mr David
Conservative
Signed on 15 October 2001
Aylesbury
Malins, Mr Humfrey
Conservative
Signed on 16 October 2001
Woking
McDonnell, John
Labour
Signed on 18 October 2001
Hayes and Harlington
McWilliam, Mr John
Labour
Signed on 16 October 2001
Blaydon
Pugh, Dr John
Liberal Democrat
Signed on 22 October 2001
Southport
Randall, Mr John
Conservative
Signed on 15 October 2001
Uxbridge
Robertson, Hugh
Conservative
Signed on 15 October 2001
Faversham and Mid Kent
Sawford, Phil
Labour
Signed on 18 October 2001
Kettering
Simpson, Alan
Labour
Signed on 1 November 2001
Nottingham South
Stanley, Sir John
Conservative
Signed on 17 October 2001
Tonbridge and Malling
Taylor, Mr Ian
Conservative
Signed on 23 October 2001
Esher and Walton
Trend, Mr Michael
Conservative
Signed on 15 October 2001
Windsor
Vis, Dr Rudi
Labour
Signed on 31 October 2001
Finchley and Golders Green
Widdecombe, Miss Ann
Conservative
Signed on 5 November 2001
Maidstone and The Weald

There are no withdrawn signatures for this motion.