Skip to main content

STOCKPORT STOCK TRANSFER

EDM (Early Day Motion) 586: tabled on 28 January 2003

Tabled in the 2002-03 session.

This motion has been signed by 23 Members. It has received 1 amendment.

As this motion is using historical data, we may not have the record of the original ordering, in which case signatories are listed alphabetically.

Amendment to this motion

There has been an amendment submitted to this motion.

View details of the amendment

Motion text

That this House notes with alarm the way Stockport Council is running its stock transfer campaign; further notes that the council is now so desperate to get a yes vote it is refusing to provide local honourable Members with a list of tenants eligible to vote, that it is using housing officers to canvass for a yes vote, with a bonus of ú400 for every 300 contacts and that it instructs those canvassers to mislead tenants by implying there will be no rent increases and that all will get new bathrooms and kitchens and that tenants will get a bigger say in how their properties are managed; and deeply regrets that it is proceeding with the scheme in spite of there being major anomalies in the offer document.

The first 6 Members who have signed to support the motion are the sponsors. The primary sponsor is generally the person who tabled the motion and has responsibility for it. The date shown is when the Member signed the motion.

In addition to the sponsors, the following Members have signed to support the motion.

These members had previously signed the motion, but have now withdrawn their support. The date shown is when the Member withdrew their signature from the motion.

After a motion has been tabled, other Members can table amendments to it. Amendments to this motion are shown below.

STOCKPORT STOCK TRANSFER (Amendment 1)
leave out from 'notes' to end and add: 'with interest the way Stockport Council is implementing the Labour Government's policy of stock transfer in close partnership with the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, and overseen by the Independent Tenants Advisory Service; commends the Council for its long-standing attempts to secure loan sanction from successive governments that would have allowed it to improve its housing stock and avoid the necessity for stock transfer, for its scrupulous adherence to the procedures and legislation governing tenants' ballots, including The Data Protection Act, and for its repeated public declarations that it is a matter for tenants to decide what is in their best interests.'.
Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove
29
signatures
EDM 586A1: tabled on 5 February 2003