NATIONAL OFFENDER MANAGEMENT SERVICE

As this motion is using historical data, we may not have the record of the original ordering, in which case signatories are listed alphabetically.

Amendments to this motion

There have been 2 amendments submitted to this motion.

View details of the amendments

Motion text

That this House has deep concerns about the structure of the National Offender Management Service, particularly the lack of organisational detail; strongly endorses the work of both the National Probation Service and Her Majesty's Prison Service; and therefore calls upon the Government to ensure that both services receive adequate public funding for their purpose and that the process of contestability is not used as a threat to staff or voluntary sector providers.

The first 6 Members who have signed to support the motion are the sponsors. The primary sponsor is generally the person who tabled the motion and has responsibility for it. The date shown is when the Member signed the motion.

Hackney North and Stoke Newington

Rossendale and Darwen

In addition to the sponsors, the following Members have signed to support the motion.

North East Derbyshire

Manchester, Withington

Brake, Tom

Liberal Democrat

8 June 2004

Carshalton and Wallington

Mid Dorset and North Poole

Brown, Mr Nicholas

Labour

7 June 2004

Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend

Regent's Park and Kensington North

North East Bedfordshire

Campbell, Sir Menzies

Carmichael, Mr Alistair

Barnsley West and Penistone

Newcastle upon Tyne Central

Kingston and Surbiton

Haltemprice and Howden

Heywood and Middleton

Galloway and Upper Nithsdale

Dunwoody, Mrs Gwyneth

Barnsley East and Mexborough

Stoke-on-Trent Central

Flight, Mr Howard

Conservative

10 May 2004

Arundel and South Downs

Birmingham, Sparkbrook and Small Heath

Runnymede and Weybridge

Oxford West and Abingdon

Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney

North East Hertfordshire

North Southwark and Bermondsey

Humble, Mrs Joan

Labour

7 June 2004

Blackpool North and Fleetwood

Hunter, Mr Andrew

Independent Conservative

Birmingham, Selly Oak

Meirionnydd Nant Conwy

Loughton, Tim

Conservative

6 May 2004

East Worthing and Shoreham

Strathkelvin and Bearsden

Wolverhampton South West

Marsden, Mr Paul

Liberal Democrat

6 May 2004

Shrewsbury and Atcham

Marshall-Andrews, Mr Robert

McLoughlin, Mr Patrick

Kingston upon Hull North

South West Hertfordshire

Paice, Mr James

Conservative

4 May 2004

South East Cambridgeshire

Carmarthen East and Dinefwr

Faversham and Mid Kent

Robertson, Mr Laurence

Conservative

12 May 2004

Tewkesbury

Robinson, Mr Geoffrey

Hackney South and Shoreditch

Selous, Andrew

Conservative

18 May 2004

South West Bedfordshire

Shaw, Jonathan

Labour

9 June 2004

Chatham and Aylesford

Shephard, Mrs Gillian

Birmingham, Erdington

Morecambe and Lunesdale

Spelman, Mrs Caroline

North West Leicestershire

Rochford and Southend East

Wolverhampton South East

Finchley and Golders Green

Wareing, Mr Robert N.

Labour

5 May 2004

Liverpool, West Derby

North East Milton Keynes

Whittingdale, Mr John

Conservative

12 May 2004

Maldon and East Chelmsford

Brecon and Radnorshire

Willis, Mr Phil

Liberal Democrat

10 June 2004

Harrogate and Knaresborough

Winterton, Sir Nicholas

Clydebank and Milngavie

Sittingbourne and Sheppey

Younger-Ross, Richard

Liberal Democrat

7 June 2004

Teignbridge

These members had previously signed the motion, but have now withdrawn their support. The date shown is when the Member withdrew their signature from the motion.

Birmingham, Hodge Hill

Amendments (2)

After a motion has been tabled, other Members can table amendments to it. Amendments to this motion are shown below.

NATIONAL OFFENDER MANAGEMENT SERVICE (Amendment 1)

Line 3, leave out from second 'Service' to 'calls' in line 4.

Mr Graham Allen

Labour, Nottingham North

signatures

EDM 1119A1: tabled on 25 May 2004

NATIONAL OFFENDER MANAGEMENT SERVICE (Amendment 2)

Line 6, at end add 'calls upon the Home Office to bring before the House for consideration only policies which have been widely consulted upon with all those affected and then subjected to online pre-legislative scrutiny by Parliament, so that legislating in haste does not have to be followed by further corrective legislation, adjustment and guidance in order to make often good intentions into workable frontline practice; regrets the retreat of probation services from the localities and neighbourhoods of our constituencies and believes that this is one of the real service delivery problems for beleaguered communities that any reform of rehabilitation services should address before yet more top-down restructuring.'

Mr Graham Allen

Labour, Nottingham North

signatures

EDM 1119A2: tabled on 25 May 2004

EDM (Early Day Motion) 1119: tabled on 04 May 2004

Amendments to this motion

Motion text

Signatures (254)

Amendments (2)