As this motion is using historical data, we may not have the record of the original ordering, in which case signatories are listed alphabetically.
This motion has subsequently been withdrawn by the tabling Member.
Suggested amendment
Leave out from 'House' to end and add 'rejects the argument for a junction at Stratford; notes that British Rail and its Joint Venture Partners have carried out a thorough investigation of all practical proposals for the Channel Tunnel Rail Link based on the needs of passengers; and looks forward to the construction of a link at Kings Cross which will allow the development of international rail services to the North and Scotland.'.
Original motion text
That this House urges British Rail to give full and thorough consideration to proposals for a Channel Tunnel Rail Link based on a junction at Stratford, and to enter into professional discussions with those proposing the Stratford alternative before presenting their Private Bill to Parliament for a decision.
Signatures (1)
The first 6 Members who have signed to support the motion are the sponsors. The primary sponsor is generally the person who tabled the motion and has responsibility for it. The date shown is when the Member signed the motion.
There are no withdrawn signatures for this amendment.